Edition 004 / From the field
After Moisson
A Sunday field note about the distance between working software and a church experience people can depend on.
Based on Phil Baptiste’s firsthand account. These are observations from September 27, 2026.
The service exposed the gaps
Moisson brought months of work into a real church day. The program carried the pastor’s written message, but the planned remote video appearance did not happen. The stream suffered interruptions. Camera direction, projection, graphics, troubleshooting, and coordination competed for the same operator’s attention.
An experience that depends on one person holding every connection together is not yet a dependable system. Better software has to reduce that burden, and clear responsibilities and human support have to accompany it.
There was tangible progress
A twelve-page program review edition brought together the service order, the pastoral message, and selected hymn texts, with an editable source for corrections. The published program and the ChurchOS access-request page were reachable. Requesting access, however, is not the same as completing onboarding.
A local promotional display cycled through church information, the program, and an invitation to request access every 36 seconds. It demonstrated a useful presentation path; it was not yet commissioned as an always-on public channel.
Isolated corrections for Finance, invitation activation, and songbook integration also received testing. At the September 27 closeout, they had not been deployed. Those distinctions belong in the story.
What moving forward means
The next milestone is a repeatable Sunday: a dependable viewing destination, a usable program, a complete onboarding journey, and an operating handoff that someone else can follow.
Each part needs to work with the others, under real conditions, with a practiced fallback. Today produced useful work and a clearer account of what remains. The commitment now is to turn those pieces into an experience that asks less of the people serving.